John Locke Government Essay

With disclose a accomplished participation, all(a) dominions of order begin to break down. At this point, thither really is no night club present. Rather, on that point is anarchy and an anarchistic corporation is not one where the world foundation be reasonably c bed for and protected. earth-closet Locke puts a instruction m either assessments in this look at. However, Locke excessively understands that the online state of society entrust often act a share in terms of how we react to it. In Richard II, we exact a monarchy of a society that fails to be civilized in a quash of ways. Because of this, action is taken by received members of the rabble.This does raise questions regarding whether or not the actions of these characters in the play support or break the theories of commode Locke as they relate to the civil society. A closer examination of the play go away reveal answers in this regard. In the play, we call certain callous and unquestionably not we llspring mentation out actions on the part of Richard II. In the archaeozoic stages of the play, the office interferes in a treble between Bolingbroke and Mowbray. The former is banished for 6 historic period as a result of his actions with the last mentioned is banished forever.This creates bang-up animosity among Mowbray and his followers age also setting the stage for the introduction of a serious enemy. Such actions ar further compounded when Richard appropriates all the discharge of John of Gaunt for himself when the character passes away. ar such actions those of a ruler that professes to do a civil society? A great many arguments tramp be made that such actions are merely noble in their intent and action. At the core of Lockes writing is that there really is no such function as a divinity among the major powers that rule a particular undercoat.In separate words, kings are not nobleman macrocosms that ignore impose their will on the populace in any way t hey curb fit. There are various John Locke, Government, and RICHARD II Page 2 reasons wherefore Locke promotes such a tactile sensation. Firstly, he recognizes that kings are human organisms and, hence, fallible as all humans are. This heap accept to kings being self- helping as opposed to serving their subjects and the rule of law. When both of these components are ignored, the civil society breaks down. Also, it becomes impossible for proper ecesis to exist unless deep and serious thought is put forth to fightds the nature and role of ruling.So, when a king puts forth the attitude that all things are good because of his divine will, society runs the risk of collapsing. Why is this so? Mainly, it is because no logic is being industrious by the ruler. Rather, the king believes all things ordained correct because the king is infallible. This does little to a greater extent than set the stage for the collapse of the kings rule as well as the collapse of the civil society. We can see this in RICHARD II in several ways. Richard slowly seems to lose his udder on proper rule and becomes a self-serving entity.During the events of the play, we learn that Richards kingdom is involved in a long, bitter, and lengthened state of war with Ireland. As such, the need for make proper and accurate decisions is a must. brusque decisions can undermine the effectiveness of the war effort which, in turn, can lead to a collapse of the kingdom. Early in the play, Richard is accused of not properly managing the war effort as manifest by his personal appropriations of Gaunts wealthiness among other improprieties. This sets in motion the mood that he must be accustomed as the ruler of the kingdom. John Locke, Government, and RICHARD II Pg 3While all rulers will be criticized at some point, the well-nigh stinging criticism would be that the leader does not hold the fabric of society together. Rather, he contributes to the collapse of society. An argument of these so rts can be made towards the rule of Richard II. Of great concern to Locke is the capriciousness that the population has a right to private property and that any government or ruler that infringes on private property is little more than than a tyranny. In the context of RICHARD II, there is a ruler that has no follow for private property as evidenced by his unlawful seizing of land and wealth.This poses the question when a king acts lawless, is there any law to the land? Locke also was an avowed believer in the notion that government must represent the will of the people. Those governments that do not provide for the populace in such a way will run the risk of being legitimately overthrown by the motivated members of the populace. We see such events played out in RICAHRD II in many unlike ways. Ultimately, all the actions of King Richard promote the notion that he does not serve his subject.Rather, he serves his own personal goals with little regard for the life and property of th ose he is entrusted to apprehension for. One could say that RICHARD II rightfully does provide a clear comment of the problems with government detailed in John Lockes SECOND TREATISE OF GOVERNMENT. As such, it would be safe to infer that Locke would hardly delight in of the way Richard II rules. Considering the downfall of the king in the play, Richard II would have been discontinue served had be been guided by Lockes philosophical approach to government.